Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:51:52 -0500
Message-ID: <bY-dnYBAH4AGTa7dRVn-uw_at_golden.net>
"Eric Kaun" <ekaun_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:BkNYb.12242$ti.1395_at_newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
> Can you give some good links to learn about TDM in general, and XDb in
> particular? I know little about either; is TDM the temporal extensions of
> Chris Date?
>
> "Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4b45d3ad.0402180810.472e69e2_at_posting.google.com...
> > > After all, Euclidean Geometry is absolutely rock solid.
> > > So is Newtonian Mechanics. *Mathematically*, they are faultless.
> > > It's just that when you apply them to the real world, they break.?
> >
> > The Bob & Alfredo Bandwagon can't get past the above. For modelling
> > complex things my favorite is TDM. TDM is to RDM what Quantum is to
> > Newtonian. A paritial implementation of TDM is XDb.
Just to alert you: Neo/James is the worst of the lot. He makes the stupidest and most ignorant among the Pick crowd seem like educated genii. Received on Wed Feb 18 2004 - 21:51:52 CET