Re: Table design question
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:53:41 -0500
Message-ID: <bICdnfytNMUOnLXdRVn-tw_at_golden.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:53:41 -0500
Message-ID: <bICdnfytNMUOnLXdRVn-tw_at_golden.net>
"D Guntermann" <guntermann_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Hstwz4.59I_at_news.boeing.com...
> "Tony" <andrewst_at_onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
> news:c0e3f26e.0402090330.1ba1c048_at_posting.google.com...
> >
> > Of course, it is conceivable that an organisation might
> > decide in advance that all user_id values must be taken from the
> > enumerated set {1, 112, 314, ... 9997}, but if so then of course they
> > pay the penalty in the complexity of enforcing the constraint.
Dan,
Why does it seem your entire response to Tony ignores the above statement? Are you trying to talk past him? Received on Mon Feb 09 2004 - 22:53:41 CET