Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: relations aren't types?

Re: relations aren't types?

From: Adrian Kubala <adrian_at_sixfingeredman.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 12:41:05 -0600
Message-ID: <slrnbu95u1.nqi.adrian@sixfingeredman.net>


Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net> schrieb:
> [...] Thus "relation" refers to values of a generic type and not to a
> specific type, per se. [...]

I understand what a relation is. If anything, I'm fuzzy on the definition of "type".

Consider the type "student" which is defined as as the set of tuples: {<"joe", "schmoe">, <"sally", "strauss">}. In what way is this not a type, or not a relation? Received on Sat Dec 20 2003 - 12:41:05 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US