| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Is relational theory irrelevant? (was Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL)
"Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com> wrote in message
news:DxBsb.30$1n1.179_at_news.oracle.com...
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
> news:COydnd-jwepVXC-iRVn-hQ_at_golden.net...
> > "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
> > news:Vftsb.179962$HS4.1498393_at_attbi_s01...
> > > "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
> > news:VaWdndbrNqgr0y-iRVn-jg_at_golden.net...
> > > >
> > > > Relations have no order. The values in relations have order. An
> ordered
> > > > structure, like an array for instance, involves physical order.
> > >
> > > Why? Why can't you have logical order?
> >
> > Ordered domains do have logical order. Relations have no order, but the
> > values in the relations have order.
>
As I said above, ordered domains do have logical order. Received on Thu Nov 13 2003 - 07:19:41 CST
![]() |
![]() |