Re: foundations of relational theory?

From: Homer L. Hazel <hNoOmerlhANTI_at_SPAMcox.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 11:33:57 -0800
Message-ID: <EUTob.50261$gi2.47163_at_fed1read01>


Sorry,

Your theory does not match reality.

The Brontosaurus is extinct! 8>)

Larry Hazel

"SixFtWabbit" <dragoninbabylon_at_cox.net> wrote in message news:dNSob.119979$La.59953_at_fed1read02...
> "This is my theory. It is a theory and it is mine.
> The Brontosaurus is thin on one end, much much thicker in the middle, and
> thin again on the other end."
> Anne Elk
>
> "Joe" <avoidingspam_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:bnuink$159kuh$1_at_ID-49604.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in
> > news:bntqpg$odk$1_at_mantis.golden.net:
> >
> > > "Joe" <avoidingspam_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:bnsf67$14s3bj$1_at_ID-49604.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > >> bbadour_at_golden.net (Bob Badour) wrote in
> > >> news:cd3b3cf.0310300617.1e902652_at_posting.google.com:
> > >>
> > >> > cmurthi <xyzcmurthi_at_quest.with.a.w.net> wrote in message
> > >> > news:<3F9FEB3A.9090508_at_quest.with.a.w.net>...
> > >> >> Please, Jeffrey, don't bother to engage in a pissing context;
> > >> >> let BB stew in his own poisonous words. There are others with
> > >> >> whom we can debate reasonably.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Oh, and someone capable of saying "A well-designed base database
> > >> >> will require few or no complex constraints" is obviously living
> > >> >> in an alternate universe and not worthy of serious
> > >> >> consideration.
> > >> >
> > >> > If you mean a universe with better data management products than
> > >> > Pick, then yes, I live in a different universe than you. I live
> > >> > in the real one.
> > >>
> > >> That's good. A guy from comp.databases.theory claiming to live in
> > >> the real world. Bob, to quote you, you're an idiot.
> > >
> > > Theory exists in the real world and exists to describe the real
> > > world. You are the idiot.
> >
> > I stand corrected - you're a funny idiot, Bob. <g>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Joe
>
>
Received on Sat Nov 01 2003 - 20:33:57 CET

Original text of this message