Re: foundations of relational theory?

Admittedly, I am an idiot. However, when we reduce ourselves to calling eachother idiots in what seems to be moving beyond playful banter, we've crossed over from stimulating, intellectual conversation to mind-numbing child's play.

Can anyone teach this idiot how to ignore this thread?

Albert

"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message news:bntqpg$odk$1_at_mantis.golden.net...
> "Joe" <avoidingspam_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:bnsf67$14s3bj$1_at_ID-49604.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > bbadour_at_golden.net (Bob Badour) wrote in
> > news:cd3b3cf.0310300617.1e902652_at_posting.google.com:
> >
> > > cmurthi <xyzcmurthi_at_quest.with.a.w.net> wrote in message
> > > news:<3F9FEB3A.9090508_at_quest.with.a.w.net>...
> > >> Please, Jeffrey, don't bother to engage in a pissing context; let
> > >> BB stew in his own poisonous words. There are others with whom we
> > >> can debate reasonably.
> > >>
> > >> Oh, and someone capable of saying "A well-designed base database
> > >> will require few or no complex constraints" is obviously living in
> > >> an alternate universe and not worthy of serious consideration.
> > >
> > > If you mean a universe with better data management products than
> > > Pick, then yes, I live in a different universe than you. I live in
> > > the real one.
> >
> > That's good. A guy from comp.databases.theory claiming to live in the
> > real world. Bob, to quote you, you're an idiot.

>