Re: foundations of relational theory?

From: Mike Preece <michael_at_preece.net>
Date: 23 Oct 2003 14:28:39 -0700
Message-ID: <1b0b566c.0310231328.ddf8fcb_at_posting.google.com>


michael_at_preece.net (Mike Preece) wrote in message news:<1b0b566c.0310230219.3f943933_at_posting.google.com>...
> michael_at_preece.net (Mike Preece) wrote in message news:<1b0b566c.0310172139.5f35ce67_at_posting.google.com>...
> > michael_at_preece.net (Mike Preece) wrote in message news:<1b0b566c.0310161356.76cc84e7_at_posting.google.com>...
> > > "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message news:<e6ScnbwcF6_hAhOiU-KYkA_at_golden.net>...
> > > [snip]
> > > >... I have no desire to leave novices uninformed about the ignorance and
> > > > stupidity they find online.
> > > >
> [snip]
> > > > Why not study the foundations of your professional practice
> > > > instead?
> > > >
> [snip]
> > > >
> > > > I drew my conclusions regarding Pick after careful research and full
> > > > understanding.
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > Where did you do your careful research Bob? Which references did you use?
> > >
> > > Mike.
> >
> >
> > Anyone see where Bob went? If you see him tell him he must have missed this post.
>
> Sheesh! I could have sworn he was around here somewhere. Bob?

It seems there's never a self-agrandising, ignorant, arrogant twat around when you want one. Shame - especially as he "has no desire to leave novices uninformed about the ignorance and stupidity they find online". Still, I suppose if I'm prepared to wait, two of them will come along at once. Received on Thu Oct 23 2003 - 23:28:39 CEST

Original text of this message