Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 08:06:29 -0400
Message-ID: <00mdnarPxa5nUg6iU-KYhQ_at_golden.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 08:06:29 -0400
Message-ID: <00mdnarPxa5nUg6iU-KYhQ_at_golden.net>
"Alfredo Novoa" <alfredo_at_ncs.es> wrote in message
news:e4330f45.0310200123.22c87e36_at_posting.google.com...
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
news:<2KGcndSx3deeog2iXTWJlg_at_golden.net>...
>
> > I suggest you notify the sources that equate imperative with procedural
that
> > their definitions are wrong.
>
> Ok, but the "declarative" definition is correct.
>
> Then Tutorial D is a logic, declarative, imperative and procedural
language :-)
Very true. I hadn't thought of it that way, but it does include just about everything except the kitchen sink. Doesn't it? Received on Mon Oct 20 2003 - 14:06:29 CEST