Re: More pain and sufferring with Tropashko's materialized path...

From: --CELKO-- <joe.celko_at_northface.edu>
Date: 15 Sep 2003 15:28:30 -0700
Message-ID: <a264e7ea.0309151428.4fa358d7_at_posting.google.com>

>> When I execute this function with a number such as 113755/65536, I get
arithmetic overflow. <<

Have you tried DECIMAL(12,0) datatypes? Received on Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:28:30 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mikito Harakiri: "Re: Corrected definition of locally invertible transformation"
Previous message: Jan Hidders: "Re: Corrected definition of locally invertible transformation"
In reply to: Robin Tucker: "More pain and sufferring with Tropashko's materialized path..."
In reply to Robin Tucker: "More pain and sufferring with Tropashko's materialized path..."
Next in thread: Mikito Harakiri: "Re: Corrected definition of locally invertible transformation"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message