Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_at_ncs.es>
Date: 15 Sep 2003 02:21:02 -0700
Message-ID: <e4330f45.0309150121.464323f3_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 15 Sep 2003 02:21:02 -0700
Message-ID: <e4330f45.0309150121.464323f3_at_posting.google.com>
Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_pandora.be> wrote in message news:<Ym%8b.20114$7y3.1376399_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>...
> By the way, what is exactly your definition of "updatable"? Should there be
> at least one instance and one update such that the result is well-defined,
> or should for all instances all updates be definied, or something in
> between?
IMO "updatable view" is a bad term. It has the same sense as "updatable table".
Regards
Alfredo
Received on Mon Sep 15 2003 - 11:21:02 CEST