Re: does a table always need a PK?
Date: 3 Sep 2003 07:47:48 -0700
Message-ID: <6dae7e65.0309030647.180690dd_at_posting.google.com>
Lee Fesperman <firstsql_at_ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<3F553875.7565_at_ix.netcom.com>...
> Lennart Jonsson wrote:
> >
> > Lee Fesperman <firstsql_at_ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<3F510C49.2A6E_at_ix.netcom.com>...
> > > Bob Badour wrote:
> > > >
[...]
> >
> > DB2 support recursive queries (from what I understand, so does Oracle)
> > with some restrictions. Is FirstSQL less restricted on what kind of
> > recursion it allows?
>
> Yes, and perhaps others do too. I didn't mean to imply that the last list of features
> were unique to FirstSQL and didn't want to get into detail arguments about whose
> recursive support is better.
>
> They are features that improve relational compliance over Standard SQL, and I doubt that
> other SQL DBMSs provide more than 4.
Ok, I was only curious, and figured that you could provide me with the answer faster than I could look it up my self.
/Lennart Received on Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:47:48 CEST