Re: Is mysql a RDBMS ?
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 03:57:08 GMT
Message-ID: <oOf2b.2251$Jh2.1690_at_newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>
They write an excellent book, and I've read several, including Date, Mannino, Kroenke, Ozsu & Valduriez, etc. The most notable omission in my mind is Ullman and Widom's book.
Both authors have been very productive and influential in the research and academic fields over the years. Bite your tongue (or publish something worthwhile).
Regards,
Daniel Guntermann
"Leandro Guimar?s Faria Corsetti Dutra" <lgcdutra_at_terra.com.br> wrote in
message news:pan.2003.08.24.21.23.30.807583_at_terra.com.br...
> Em Sun, 24 Aug 2003 19:00:24 +0000, Heikki Tuuri escreveu:
>
> > we can conclude that MySQL is 'Elmasri-Navathe-relational'.
>
> We can also conclude Elmasri and Navathe have been corrupted
> by the market out of any sense...
>
>
> --
> _ Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +41 (21) 648 11 34
> / \ http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/ +41 (78) 778 11 34
> \ / Responda à lista, não a mim diretamente! +55 (11) 5686 2219
> / \ Dê nota se ajudei: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=leandro
>
Received on Mon Aug 25 2003 - 05:57:08 CEST