Re: oracle sequence numbers
From: Pablo Sanchez <pablo_at_dev.null>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:07:58 -0600
Message-ID: <Xns930667140ED89pingottpingottbah_at_216.166.71.233>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:07:58 -0600
Message-ID: <Xns930667140ED89pingottpingottbah_at_216.166.71.233>
Mike Sherrill <MSherrill_at_compuserve.com> wrote in
news:ijag2vgtcjgi8mj3atitda98q6povuegta_at_4ax.com:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:35:08 -0600, Pablo Sanchez <pablo_at_dev.null>
> wrote:
>
>>Which DBMS are you thinking about?
>
> Ones that conform to the SQL standard.
I'll knock off the ones that do _not_ support it:
- up to Oracle 9iR2 - latest
- up to Sybase ASE 12.5 - latest
- up to SQL Server 2000 - latest
I believe that accounts for about 45% of the DBMS market-share. I don't know if DB2 has support for it.
> "TIMESTAMP" means one thing in standard SQL. It means something
> completely different to SQL Server.
and to Sybase ASE 12.5 and Oracle 9iR2.
-- Pablo Sanchez, High-Performance Database Engineering http://www.hpdbe.comReceived on Fri Jan 17 2003 - 18:07:58 CET