| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Why 3FN is so strict?
Hi,
I don't understand why in 3NF an indirect dependency of a key attribute with respect to another key attribute is not considered a transitive dependency. That would imply that 3NF equals BCNF. I think is very strange the way in which the original definition of 3FN was limited.
Any ideas?.
Thanks in advance Received on Sun Nov 17 2002 - 11:30:26 CST
![]() |
![]() |