Re: Storing query language in relations
From: Jonathan Leffler <jleffler_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 05:10:49 GMT
Message-ID: <3D9BD15D.9030704_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 05:10:49 GMT
Message-ID: <3D9BD15D.9030704_at_earthlink.net>
Mikito Harakiri wrote:
> pbrazier_at_cosmos-uk.co.uk (Paul) wrote in message news:<51d64140.0210020857.278ac3ba_at_posting.google.com>...
>
>>Are there DBMSs where you can "create" new tables, views, indexes,
>>constraints, etc. just by inserting into the appropriate system
>>tables? So the DDL becomes redundant?
>>
>
> I also thought about it ~yr ago: it is certainly a nice idea. DBA have
> to learn only catalog schema, no stupid DDL.
And, if http://www.mcjones.org/System_R/bs12.html is to be believed (and I've no reason not to believe it), it was thought of for Business System 12 a lot longer than a year ago.
-- Jonathan Leffler #include <disclaimer.h> Email: jleffler_at_earthlink.net, jleffler_at_us.ibm.com Guardian of DBD::Informix 1.00.PC2 -- http://dbi.perl.org/Received on Thu Oct 03 2002 - 07:10:49 CEST