Re: references: S-trees or S+-trees

From: Marcus <marcus-aurelius_at_volcanomail.com>
Date: 13 Aug 2002 08:21:28 -0700
Message-ID: <605cf1a8.0208130721.224933f3_at_posting.google.com>


Olaf Dabrunz <Olaf.Dabrunz_at_gmx.de> wrote in message news:<2211659.PTIobQ9Gjl_at_santana.dyndns.org>...
> Hello all,
>
> can someone please point me to a good reference on S-trees and/or
> S+-trees, preferably for on-line ressources?
>
> Thanks a lot.

This paper looks like it defines S-Trees, at the least. And I was just reading
it the full text (in pdf) online.

http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/tousidou00improved.html

This was just the first paper I found on citeseer on this topic (about which I admittedly know almost zero about at the present time, but it looks like the right thing), I believe there were several more search results at least. Many of the papers described on citeseer are also available in full text online and they include citations from and to other papers on similar subjects (besides the sitewide search which I used).

hope this helps,

Marcus Received on Tue Aug 13 2002 - 17:21:28 CEST

Original text of this message