Re: references: S-trees or S+-trees

From: Paulie <paul_at_not.a.chance.ie>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:03:09 GMT
Message-ID: <3d583089.22497770_at_127.0.0.1>

Olaf Dabrunz <Olaf.Dabrunz_at_gmx.de> wrote:

> can someone please point me to a good reference on S-trees and/or
> S+-trees, preferably for on-line ressources?

> Thanks a lot.

Put "S+-trees" into Google.

Paul...

-- 

plinehan__AT__yahoo__DOT__com

Received on Tue Aug 13 2002 - 00:03:09 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Olaf Dabrunz: "Re: references: S-trees or S+-trees"
Previous message: Kevin B Ebert: "Database design best practice"
In reply to: Olaf Dabrunz: "references: S-trees or S+-trees"
In reply to Olaf Dabrunz: "references: S-trees or S+-trees"
Next in thread: Olaf Dabrunz: "Re: references: S-trees or S+-trees"
Reply: Olaf Dabrunz: "Re: references: S-trees or S+-trees"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message