Re: The Foundation of OO (XDb)
From: Phlip <phlip_cpp_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 15 Jun 2002 15:04:23 GMT
Message-ID: <aefl1n$256_at_dispatch.concentric.net>
>
> What would be the most appropriate name for the intersection of a
> Variable X-Dimensional Relation? Would it still be called a point?
Date: 15 Jun 2002 15:04:23 GMT
Message-ID: <aefl1n$256_at_dispatch.concentric.net>
James wrote:
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
> news:<Q_zO8.358$Dw1.51783809_at_radon.golden.net>...
>> "James" <jraustin1_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:a6e74506.0206142035.662b10e9_at_posting.google.com... >> > Considering the amount of existing confusion + my redefintions, >> > your suggestions to use new vocabulary seem more appealing.... >> > What word can I use instead of an object? >> >> Would "record" describe what your product uses?
>
> What would be the most appropriate name for the intersection of a
> Variable X-Dimensional Relation? Would it still be called a point?
"Intersection"...
Which leads to Set Theory, which is >another< subject best learned anywhere but on newsgroups!
--
Phlip
http://www.greencheese.org/MakeItSo
-- It's a small Web, after all... --
Received on Sat Jun 15 2002 - 17:04:23 CEST