Re: The Foundation of OO (XDb)
Date: 15 Jun 2002 05:13:05 -0700
Message-ID: <a6e74506.0206150413.2dbf8b7a_at_posting.google.com>
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message news:<Q_zO8.358$Dw1.51783809_at_radon.golden.net>...
> "James" <jraustin1_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:a6e74506.0206142035.662b10e9_at_posting.google.com...
> > Considering the amount of existing confusion + my redefintions,
> > your suggestions to use new vocabulary seem more appealing....
> > What word can I use instead of an object?
>
> Would "record" describe what your product uses?
I have come to the conclusion that my model is NOT the OO or
Relational Model.
And that my attempt to describe it as such requires hi-jacking the
OO/Relational concepts and vocabulary which has resulted in a lot of
confusion for everyone. As you have indicated the Relational Model has
sound mathematical theory behind it and I have none. Therefore I will
rename my model and vocabulary and present it separately from OO or
Relational.
Received on Sat Jun 15 2002 - 14:13:05 CEST