Re: The Foundation of OO (XDb)

From: James <jraustin1_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 14 Jun 2002 21:35:14 -0700
Message-ID: <a6e74506.0206142035.662b10e9_at_posting.google.com>

Considering the amount of existing confusion + my redefintions, your suggestions to use new vocabulary seem more appealing.... What word can I use instead of an object? Received on Sat Jun 15 2002 - 06:35:14 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bob Badour: "Re: Relations contain Objects"
Previous message: James: "Re: The Foundation of OO (XDb)"
Maybe in reply to: James: "The Foundation of OO (XDb)"
Next in thread: Bob Badour: "Re: Relations contain Objects"
Reply: Bob Badour: "Re: The Foundation of OO (XDb)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message