Re: Help with complex db design concepts
From: drop the numbers <Paul>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 20:13:30 GMT
Message-ID: <MPG.1744a2c6ebb058ba989708_at_news.easynews.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 20:13:30 GMT
Message-ID: <MPG.1744a2c6ebb058ba989708_at_news.easynews.com>
In article <57da7b56.0205091155.1f655f13_at_posting.google.com>,
paul_geoffrey_brown_at_yahoo.com says...
>
> Why are you splitting the spatial objects up into so many tables?
What if there are different attributes being tracked for different spatial entities?
The other option would be a many-to-many with an Attribute entity that has an attribute type field and SpatialEntity, with that association table holding the value that goes with the linked attribute. This could be a dangerous design, though, if these values can be numbers, strings, etc., depending on the attribute used.
-- (Any opinions expressed are strictly mine only and not my employer's) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Tiseo, Intermediate Systems Programmer Reply To: 123tiseo.paul_at_123mayo.edu (drop the numbers)Received on Thu May 09 2002 - 22:13:30 CEST