Re: Embedding the relational Modell in one big table
From: Daniel Guntermann <guntermann_at_uswest.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 22:13:03 -0700
Message-ID: <eqNv8.864$dx3.154278_at_news.uswest.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 22:13:03 -0700
Message-ID: <eqNv8.864$dx3.154278_at_news.uswest.net>
"Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bdf69bdf.0204180912.3e100e1f_at_posting.google.com...
> This paper may help:
>
> William Kent: "Consequences of Assuming a Universal Relation". TODS
> 8(4): 637-643(1983)
Having tried to research the reference, I found the title and author to be slightly different than stated above. If I am correlating the right article, the following two articles seem relevant.
Ullman, Jeffrey D. "On Kent's Consequences of Assuming A Universal Relation (Technical Correspondence)". TODS 8(4): 637-643(1983).
And....
Williams, Kent. "The Universal Relation Revisited (Technical
Correspondence)". TODS 8(4): 644-648(1983)
Received on Fri Apr 19 2002 - 07:13:03 CEST