Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: JDO comparisons

Re: JDO comparisons

From: Eric Samson <eric.samson_at_libelis.com>
Date: 20 Feb 2002 02:47:47 -0800
Message-ID: <49de0303.0202200247.15977c95@posting.google.com>


Hi Robert

2 or 3 RDBMS columns can "look like" a Java Collection if you have something like JDO, otherwise it will mostly remain "conceptual".

It seems that you consider SQL as a programming language. For me SQL is well-suited and has been designed for ad-hoc queries outside applications.
JDO QL aim is only to simply identify entry points from which you'll be able to transparently navigate in pure Java. So in JDO queries are less
JDO QL does not pretend to be an ad-hoc query language.

Anyway, a JDO implementation is free to optionally support SQL in addition to JDO QL support. This is exaclty what LiDO, our product does.

Best Regards,
Eric Samson (LIBeLIS, JDO vendor) Received on Wed Feb 20 2002 - 04:47:47 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US