repost:adt vs aggregation (cross-posted)

From: Cagdas Ozgenc <co19_at_antispam.cornell.edu>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 18:06:20 +0200
Message-ID: <a40thb$9d$1_at_news01.cit.cornell.edu>

Greetings.

What is the difference between an abstract data type vs. a type constucted using aggregation (aggregation used in the context of data models such as E/R, GSM, FDM, etc)?

Should we treat them separately or equivalently? What's your opinion?

Thanks for taking time. Received on Fri Feb 08 2002 - 17:06:20 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gary Cornelisse: "Case sensitivity in table and field names"
Previous message: Richard A. DeVenezia: "Q: Does any ANSI-SQL standard address multi-column updates ?"
Next in thread: Mike Mohr: "Re: repost:adt vs aggregation (cross-posted)"
Reply: Mike Mohr: "Re: repost:adt vs aggregation (cross-posted)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message