Re: The Fact of relational algebra (was Re: Clean Object Class Design -- What is it?)

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: 9 Sep 2001 17:20:08 -0700
Message-ID: <cd3b3cf.0109091620.5d5379f_at_posting.google.com>


"Patrick Logan" <patrickdlogan_at_home.com> wrote in message news:<cMxm7.53689$MK5.30313146_at_news1.sttln1.wa.home.com>...
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote
> in message news:cd3b3cf.0109081138.731c2192_at_posting.google.com...
> >
> > It is true that relational dbmses are much more effective than dbmses
> > based on any other known logical data model...
> > It is true that relational dbmses will perform better overall than
> > non-relational dbmses, but that performance benefit includes
> > application development time, facility of schema evolution etc.
>
> Those are fairly broad, ill-defined claims. I find it difficult to accept
> that they are always "true". Could you please clarify?

I cannot do justice to over thirty years of theory, research and empirical measurements in a usenet message. I am afraid you will have to educate yourself at your own expense. Received on Mon Sep 10 2001 - 02:20:08 CEST

Original text of this message