Re: Clean Object Class Design -- Circle/Ellipse
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 06:04:34 GMT
Message-ID: <S7mh7.23105$Ki1.1875142_at_bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
"Marc Gluch" <marc.gluch_at_mindtap.com> wrote in message
news:3b846a13.4005681195_at_news.grpvine1.tx.home.com...
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2001 21:19:11 -0400, "peter_douglass" wrote:
>
> >Let me ask you. Does a subtype, in your opinion, need to be a subclass?
> The over way around.
And that, in a nutshell, is the heart of the problem. I know I don't have
the
"solutions", but I saw this issue debated back to 1987. It was an
"atlantic" gulf. The Europeans were banging the type drum, and the
Americans were honking the class horn. Both right, both lost without
the other, both unable to make it across the ocean and put the two
together in a theoretically palatable sense. Meanwhile, we're still stuck
with only the latter to program with.
(Marc, I'll try and get back to our last post, but I haven't had the energy the last few days. I keep looking at it and hitting the "mark as unread" button. P.S. Your brother doesn't know what you're talking about either -- but he says you were always reading wierd math books at an early age :-) Received on Fri Aug 24 2001 - 08:04:34 CEST