Re: Efficiency; advanced/future SQL constructs
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 19:35:16 GMT
Message-ID: <UJyg7.279$Iw2.18373_at_petpeeve.ziplink.net>
Harlan,
> There are some operations that are so obvious and frequent that I'm amazed
> that they didn't show up in SQL, and that I haven't read anything about
any
> planned updates to the standards that might incorporate them. Actually,
The fact that seven fundamental statements (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE,
CREATE, ALTER, and
DROP) cover thousands upon thousands of distinct application situations is
neither an accident nor an oversight.
What it means is that, upon learning these seven statements, you have a tool that is quite useful in a variety of circumstances where relational data is to be handled.
If you had a different standard tool for each different situation, you
would have thousands of tools, and, ultimately, a much longer learning
curve. Consider the English alphabet, with 26 characters, versus the
Chinese alphabet, with over
20 thousand characters. Which is easier to learn? There are, to be sure,
some advantages to the Chinese alphabet, but ease of learning is not one of
them.
-- Regards, David Cressey www.dcressey.comReceived on Tue Aug 21 2001 - 21:35:16 CEST