Re: Clean Object Class Design -- What is it?

From: Lee Fesperman <firstsql_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 23:55:49 -0700
Message-ID: <3B5D1BF5.7CBD_at_ix.netcom.com>


akmal _at_ city wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Jim Melton wrote:
>
> Jim,
>
> [snip]
>
> > > > False 3: Object databases do not have performance advantages.
> > >
> > > Again, you have not explained why my statement is false. I have
> > > repeatedly explained why it is true:
> > >
> > > The relational model determines only how the DBMS represents data to
> > > the user and not how the DBMS stores the data. Since the DBMS can
> > > store the data identically to a non-relation ODBMS, it can achieve
> > > equivalent performance.
> >
> > Your statement is false because there is no commercially available database
> > today that can achieve the real-world performance of (most, many, all?)
> > object databases.
 

> :-o
>
> For what kind of applications? (most, many, all?)
>
> <akmal/>

I must say that was quite an overreaching statement. It apparently includes operations where object databases clearly perform poorly --- like ad-hoc queries.

-- 
Lee Fesperman, FFE Software, Inc. (http://www.firstsql.com)
===================================================================
* Check out Database Debunkings (http://www.firstsql.com/dbdebunk/)
* "The Forum Where Database Matters Are Set Straight"
Received on Tue Jul 24 2001 - 08:55:49 CEST

Original text of this message