Re: S.O.D.A. database Query API - call for comments
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 18:01:56 GMT
Message-ID: <3AF3355E.6C69_at_ix.netcom.com>
Carl Rosenberger wrote:
>
> Lee Fesperman wrote:
> > Storing a table row as an object messes up the query language. How about
storing objects
> > as column values in table rows. Then you can keep a declarative query
language and be
> > able to call methods on columns. Our ORDBMS (in beta) does this -
> > http://www.firstsql.com/firstsqlj/
>
> The approach sounds very interesting but it has nothing to do with SQL. You
> might need a name change for your engine in the future.
FirstSQL/J uses SQL. A class is just another database type for a column. The only change to SQL is to allow you call the methods of a column object and a 'new' operator for creating objects.
> Where do these objects store their members?
In the database.
> How would you constrain a query with members of these objects?
By calling methods in the top (column) object and using the return value (could be another object) in SQL expressions.
> Do you use Java serialization to store objects?
Yes, in columns.
-- Lee Fesperman, FFE Software, Inc. (http://www.firstsql.com) =================================================================== * Check out Database Debunkings (http://www.firstsql.com/dbdebunk/) * "The Forum Where Database Matters Are Set Straight"Received on Sat Jul 21 2001 - 20:01:56 CEST