Re: Newbie - restructuring to eliminate many-to-many

From: Carlos Bromanski <cbroman_at_core.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:10:11 -0600
Message-ID: <3aa2774d$0$70809$1dc6e903_at_news.corecomm.net>


I would relish another post to the "Much Ado About Nothing" thread. You're right, and what I am griping about is more about application programming than database design. The original post was concerned with coding an ASP application.
- cb

David Cressey <david_at_dcressey.com> wrote in message news:Hjso6.36184$2X4.130080_at_petpeeve.ziplink.net...
> > SQL. And there isn't much practical how-to information
> > available, other than
> > manuals that say "just put an association table in between".
>
>
> Carlos,
>
>
> I think there are LOTS of good manuals that show you how to design a
> relational database. The trick is to find one that has the correct
 balance
> between theory and practice. The trade off is different for different
> people.
>
> Learning how to design and implement a many-to-many relationship is
> something you really ought to know from both a theoretical and a practical
> point of view.
>
> The vagaries of user requirements are about data analysis, not database
> design. Learning how to describe the problem is a separate skill.
 Believe
> it or not, some of the best analysts I've ever seen aren't especially good
> designers.
>
> If you want a slightly theoretical handle on the SQL NULL, I'll post
 another
> topic under the "Much Ado about Nothing" thread.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> David Cressey
> www.dcressey.com
>
>
Received on Sun Mar 04 2001 - 18:10:11 CET

Original text of this message