Re: schema question
From: Simon Richter <geier_at_phobos.fs.tum.de>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 12:42:04 +0100
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011191237390.29920-100000_at_phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 12:42:04 +0100
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011191237390.29920-100000_at_phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Clark Snowdall wrote:
> I have a quick question to pose regarding database theory. Imagine if
> you will a company that needs to keep track of 1 million users' address
> books. Is it best to:
> 1) Have a master table listing all the users' principle information
> [...] and then also have another table listing all of their address
> entries.
> OR 2) Again have a master table listing all the users' principle
> information, but instead have a new table for each user that only
> lists the address book entries for that user.
Definitely #1. A DBMS should be able to handle this efficiently.
Simon
-- GPG public key available from http://phobos.fs.tum.de/pgp/Simon.Richter.asc Fingerprint: DC26 EB8D 1F35 4F44 2934 7583 DBB6 F98D 9198 3292 Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!Received on Sun Nov 19 2000 - 12:42:04 CET