Re: A problem in SQL (a real challenge)
From: David Cressey <david_at_dcressey.com>
Date: 2000/05/12
Message-ID: <x4US4.575$s4.54018_at_petpeeve.ziplink.net>#1/1
Date: 2000/05/12
Message-ID: <x4US4.575$s4.54018_at_petpeeve.ziplink.net>#1/1
That's not the way I learned 1NF. When I was taught 1NF, a table with no possible primary key was not in 1NF.
I'm not a full time theorist. Maybe someone who is will shed some light on this.
Raimundo Lozano wrote in message <391BBFCB.2431E79A_at_medicina.ub.es>...
>The table is in 1FN because all the values are atomic, not by the fact that
the
>table has a possible primary key. If you have the table:
>
Received on Fri May 12 2000 - 00:00:00 CEST