Re: DB design for storing family tree information

From: Huber Heinz <Heinz.Huber_at_elbanet.co.at>
Date: 2000/01/20
Message-ID: <3886B070.52B47E3C_at_elbanet.co.at>#1/1

I don't think that it's absolutely hierarchical.

Daughter-in-law came to live with an ancestor after her husband died. Had some children with her husband and afterwards with his father.

Doesn't sound very hierarchical ;-)

Heinz

Tom Leylan wrote:
>
> <joe_celko_at_my-deja.com> wrote in message news:864im2$5st$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...
>
> > Hey, solve the problem, not the SQL!
>
> Excellent advice...
>
> Aren't some problems just not relational database oriented? That's why
> there are hierarchical databases right?
>
> Tom
> --
> ---> Learn a little something at http://www.leylan.com
Received on Thu Jan 20 2000 - 00:00:00 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tom Leylan: "Re: DB design for storing family tree information"
Previous message: Harry Chomsky: "Re: Bill of materials / Groups in Groups"
Maybe in reply to: P.A.: "DB design for storing family tree information"
In reply to Tom Leylan: "Re: DB design for storing family tree information"
Next in thread: Tom Leylan: "Re: DB design for storing family tree information"
Reply: Tom Leylan: "Re: DB design for storing family tree information"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message