Re: Comparison of DB2 and Oracle?
From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:29:44 -0700
Message-ID: <1098250132.913689_at_yasure>
>
> DB2
>
>
> I was actually hoping to hear from people who had used BOTH products so that
> they could tell me which they prefered and why.
>
> Rhino
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:29:44 -0700
Message-ID: <1098250132.913689_at_yasure>
Rhino wrote:
> "DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message
> news:1098155825.612649_at_yasure...
>
>>Rhino wrote: >> >> >>>>Secondly, when you post and ask such questions here ... all you are >>>>going to get are people's opinions ... some very biased opinions. >>> >>> >>>That's why I was hoping to hear from people who had used both Oracle and
>
> DB2
>
>>>but weren't employees (or resellers) of either of them. The marketing >>>information by the vendor always tends to be skewed in some way that is >>>favourable to the vendor but not necessarily a fair way. >> >>So what exactly is the value given by people in the DB2 usenet group >>saying "We're best" while the people in the Oracle usenet groups say >>"We're best"? >>
>
> I was actually hoping to hear from people who had used BOTH products so that
> they could tell me which they prefered and why.
>
> Rhino
I've used both and would gladly tell you which I prefer and why. But not when, in my opinion, you start off with a bold faced lie. Following that lie you then claim to not be a troll and not to be trying to start a flame war.
I wasn't going to believe the first lie ... why should I not suspect the second and third statements of being of equal value?
-- Daniel A. Morgan University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)Received on Wed Oct 20 2004 - 07:29:44 CEST