Re: Schema changes on on large tables

From: PR <priisberg_at_netscape.net>
Date: 16 Sep 2004 06:20:27 -0700
Message-ID: <d95b480f.0409160520.3bda17da_at_posting.google.com>

Hi,
Thanks a lot for your answer.
I checked the details of the operations (traced up the transactions), and they are all "ALTER ADD" types. However the statements contain a default value setting of 0,00 (Datatype DEC 2,2). I belive this results in roll? Received on Thu Sep 16 2004 - 15:20:27 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jim Kennedy: "Re: Oracle9i: very big problem with precition of SYSTIMESTAMP !"
Previous message: Oxnard: "Re: Poor performance after oracle 8i upgrade"
Maybe in reply to: PR: "Schema changes on on large tables"
Next in thread: agis: "Re: Poor performance after oracle 8i upgrade"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message