Re: Very strange IO problems

From: craig <someone_at_nowhere.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:13:20 -0700
Message-ID: <AQyXb.2187$hE.1541_at_fed1read07>


I am a relative amateur on the subject, but I have been reading a book Effective Oracle Design By Thomas Kyte p151. He makes mention of direct path writes and db file scattered reads. For direct path write waits come from delays writing to TEMP tablespaces ( caused by direct loads, Parallel DML updates, uncached LOBs. In his example this was caused by a PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET set too low so he increased size significantly. You might want to investigate this area.

He also researched all scattered reads by checking the code that generated the FTS. Seems you eliminated some of this, but maybe looking at why so many FTS are occuring. Is indexing not an option for some reason?

In Kyte's examples he worked till direct path writes and scattered reads were gone completely. Not sure if this is normally acheivable or just in his example.

For the rest of your processes there is little mention. Log file sync's may be high but I have no reference to go by as what is normal. Perhaps you are switching logs too often? Log files too small/too few? Just a WAG guess. Also it could be log buffer size issues. If the buffer is too big or too small you can have issues though I think bigger is generally better to a point. See http://www.ixora.com.au/tips/tuning/log_buffer_size.htm

Other than this I know of checking the instance efficiency page to make sure your soft parce percentage is high (near 100% after the instance has been up).

Hope this helps just tossing out random thought. Please post your result if you find a solution. My best guess is it is not an a Sun issue and that it is custom code, db tuning issues but that is just a guess using past experience.

"jfixsen" <jfixsen_at_virtumundo.com> wrote in message news:26bc4d13.0401220823.7ecb1e57_at_posting.google.com...
> Hello!
>
> Oracle 9.2.0.4
> SunOS pchi-db01 5.8 Generic_108528-19 sun4u sparc
> SUNW,Ultra-EnterpriseSystem = SunOS
> Node = pchi-db01
> Release = 5.8
> KernelID = Generic_108528-19
> Machine = sun4u
> BusType = <unknown>
> Serial = <unknown>
> Users = <unknown>
> OEM# = 0
> Origin# = 1
> NumCPU = 8
>
> History: we had been using a SAN disk array for storage and then
> switched over to a Sun T3. About a week after moving to the T3, I saw
> the following message in my alert log: WARNING: aiowait timed out 1
> times. No performance problems happened until about a month after
> that.
>
> Problem: We started seeing huge performance problems from out of
> nowhere on December 16 on everything from big batch jobs (heavy FTS)
> to simply logging in, and I started seeing several of these aiowait
> messages each day, sometimes up to 20. No application changes were
> made at any time during any of this, and after the performance
> problems started, I even cut the load, mostly big FTS jobs, way back.
>
> I had been running statspack everyday the entire time, and on the day
> the performance problems hit hard (about 5 weeks after going to the
> T3), the noticeable difference I saw in the statspack reports were all
> related to writes from what I could tell.
>
> BEFORE:
>
> Top 5 Timed Events
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> % Total
> Event Waits Time (s)
> Ela Time
> -------------------------------------------- ------------ -----------
> --------
> CPU time 43,689,174
> 92.51
> db file scattered read 131,668,468 949,948
> 2.01
> PX Deq: Execute Reply 931,750 496,692
> 1.05
> direct path read 73,177,620 489,356
> 1.04
> PX Deq Credit: send blkd 24,148,414 425,685
> .90
>
> AFTER:
>
> Top 5 Timed Events
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> % Total
> Event Waits Time (s)
> Ela Time
> -------------------------------------------- ------------ -----------
> --------
> log file sync 874,418 604,164
> 32.92
> direct path write 121,724 233,840
> 12.74
> PX Deq Credit: send blkd 1,103,485 212,285
> 11.57
> db file scattered read 12,039,568 165,860
> 9.04
> log buffer space 158,742 127,009
> 6.92
>
> BEFORE:
>
> Avg
> Total Wait wait
> Waits
> Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms)
> /txn
> ---------------------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ------
> --------
> db file scattered read 131,668,468 0 949,948 7
> 60.4
> PX Deq: Execute Reply 931,750 211,623 496,692 533
> 0.4
> direct path read 73,177,620 0 489,356 7
> 33.5
> PX Deq Credit: send blkd 24,148,414 122,149 425,685 18
> 11.1
> db file sequential read 31,794,392 0 349,188 11
> 14.6
> direct path write 2,652,105 0 309,880 117
> 1.2
> log file sync 3,021,375 104,267 201,582 67
> 1.4
> db file parallel write 547,546 254,564 68,136 124
> 0.3
> enqueue 27,670 14,655 50,246 1816
> 0.0
> log buffer space 110,172 32,943 47,180 428
> 0.1
>
> AFTER:
>
> Avg Total Wait
> wait Waits
> Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms)
> /txn
> ---------------------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ------
> --------
> log file sync 874,418 534,000 604,164 691
> 3.4
> direct path write 121,724 0 233,840 1921
> 0.5
> PX Deq Credit: send blkd 1,103,485 94,421 212,285 192
> 4.3
> db file scattered read 12,039,568 0 165,860 14
> 46.5
> log buffer space 158,742 120,911 127,009 800
> 0.6
> PX Deq: Execute Reply 742,346 61,708 126,984 171
> 2.9
>
>
> I am about to call Sun, but I want to be sure it's not something I'm
> overlooking. We've got all the latest sun patches, and one post I saw
> that had to do with the aiowait message said to change /etc/system to
> include the following parm after installing the patch (which we
> already had):
>
> * this parm is associated with the aiowait errors that was corrected
> in patch 112255-01 solaris v8
> set TS:ts_sleep_promote=1
>
> I haven't seen the aiowait message in the alert log since the parm had
> been added and the db restarted, but performance still sucks and
> statspack numbers are still bad. Most noticably, when I try logging
> into sqlplus, it hangs from 10-60 seconds. If I look at the wait
> events from another session, it always waits on log buffer space
> initially, and then log file sync.
>
> To me, this all smells like a SUN problem, but I would love your
> opinions before I call.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jason
> jfixsen_at_nospam_virtumundo.com
Received on Sun Feb 15 2004 - 01:13:20 CET

Original text of this message