Re: Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.

From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:55:59 -0700
Message-ID: <1063673747.987366_at_yasure>

Database Guy wrote:

Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1063490783.919594_at_yasure>...
  

So no attempt was made or intended to insult you, IBM, DB2, or anything 
else. What was made was a staight-forward statement of fact based on my 
years working with DB2
    

Your subjective claims ("low" number of...) were dubious, your single
hard claim (need for C compiler on production box), bogus.

Absolutely not. You must recompile on the production box, or should I add a clone of the production box. Which is really the same thing. You can not compile on AIX 5L and deploy on OS/390. And if you can, now, please point me to a link at ibm.com that confirms this change.

Thanks.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)

Received on Tue Sep 16 2003 - 02:55:59 CEST