Re: Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.

Friends!

I am not anti DB2. It is a good
database on Main Frames system.

System crash, if it has not happened on your production server running DB2 so far, please wait for 6-8 months.

Peter

wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au (Noons) wrote in message news:<73e20c6c.0309112234.77eaa91e_at_posting.google.com>...
> "Mark A" <ma_at_switchboard.net> wrote in message news:<pr48b.409$SZ.32376@news.uswest.net>...
> > "Peter" <peter_and_john2003_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:396cd6da.0309111138.59804915_at_posting.google.com...
> > > Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.
> > > The bottom line is when you do select, the system crash.
> > >
> > > I think it may take 4-5 years for DB2 to reach Oracle standard.
> > >
> > >
> > > Peter
> >
> > Maybe it's a problem with the DBA's.
>
> x-post trimmed in the interests of sanity...
>
>
> I thought DB2 didn't need DBAs, that was just another
> "expensive option" needed only for Oracle?
> Tsk,tsk, there goes the TCO crap...
>
> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
Received on Fri Sep 12 2003 - 16:57:26 CEST