Re: Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.
Date: 11 Sep 2003 23:34:59 -0700
Message-ID: <73e20c6c.0309112234.77eaa91e_at_posting.google.com>
"Mark A" <ma_at_switchboard.net> wrote in message news:<pr48b.409$SZ.32376_at_news.uswest.net>...
> "Peter" <peter_and_john2003_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:396cd6da.0309111138.59804915_at_posting.google.com...
> > Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.
> > The bottom line is when you do select, the system crash.
> >
> > I think it may take 4-5 years for DB2 to reach Oracle standard.
> >
> >
> > Peter
>
> Maybe it's a problem with the DBA's.
x-post trimmed in the interests of sanity...
I thought DB2 didn't need DBAs, that was just another "expensive option" needed only for Oracle? Tsk,tsk, there goes the TCO crap...
Cheers
Nuno Souto
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
Received on Fri Sep 12 2003 - 08:34:59 CEST