RE: Informix limitations, should we be using Oracle?

From: Malcolm Weallans <MWEALLANS_at_lqgroup.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:16:38 +0100
Message-ID: <aoj8na$ap9$1_at_terabinaries.xmission.com>


Could it be that Oracle is in comp.database.oracle - seems to imply that they have only one database - or is that just an objective of ours?

Malcolm

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Hamm [mailto:ahamm_at_mail.com] Sent: 16 October 2002 04:38
To: informix-list_at_iiug.org
Subject: Re: Informix limitations, should we be using Oracle?

Jim Kennedy wrote:
> Tim,
> But this is an Oracle newsgroup so clearly Oracle is better. :-)
> (reading comp.databases.oracle) Even though I've never used Informix,
> clearly Oracle is better.
> Jim

How come my preferred newserver says that comp.databases.oracle doesn't exist??? It's a respectable server from .de... Have to go to this dodgy server to get the posting working.

PS - clearly informix is better *pokes tongue out*

DISCLAIMER
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Received on Wed Oct 16 2002 - 10:16:38 CEST

Original text of this message