Re: Oracle Integrity Constraint Question
From: Edzard <edzard_at_volcanomail.com>
Date: 18 Jan 2002 06:58:11 -0800
Message-ID: <5d75e934.0201180658.13292bd6_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 18 Jan 2002 06:58:11 -0800
Message-ID: <5d75e934.0201180658.13292bd6_at_posting.google.com>
Hello,
Is it by any chance possible that some table names are being mixed up? At least that is the case in the example with re_personnel, se_personnel and RECORD_ENTRY. Another possibility is that the constraint exists but that its status is DISABLED. I hope that this is so.
Edzard Received on Fri Jan 18 2002 - 15:58:11 CET