Re: Comparing Oracle with Sybase
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 14:37:40 GMT
Message-ID: <92aafk$d9g$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>
In article <91odd1$cm5$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>, Mike Krolewski <mkrolewski_at_rii.com> wrote:
> SQLNet: allows native, fast reliable connections across dozens of
> platforms. Much better than ODBC or JDBC.
Hmmm, what do you know about Netlib or OpenClient? Besides, you are really mixing things up here between different layers of a database system, just as you tried to equal Oracle with AS/400.
Oh by the way, have you ever counted the number of unanswered questions and unsolved cases in Oracle Metalink concerning DCD, zombie processes?
> PL/SQL : an excellent extension of SQL. Really powerful language for
> developing stored procedures/functions/packages.
Heard of t-sql? Talking about developing stored procedures, you can almost wrap any sql statements between create proc and go in Sybase. I wonder if you can say the same thing with Oracle. Now if you need the procedure to return a result set...have you done it before in both worlds anyway?
> I am not sure about what is supported in the way of SQL. For instance,
> SQLServer which was derived from Sybase:
> does not have MINUS or INTERSECT
> outer joins cannot have additional conditions assigned to them
> does it allow more than one arguement in an IN clause
> update does not allow setting multiple variable at the same time
eg
> update <table>
> set ( <field1>,<field2>,<field3>) = (select a,b,c from
y)
> insert lacks control over the order or presence of variables
> often requires a single field primary key to complete work
>
> It would be informative to see what in Sybase complements these
> features.
>
I am not saying Sybase is strong in every aspect, but think about the
following:
back:) What if you don't use a catalog?
So the question is almost like "who enjoys sex better, man or woman"?
Jining Han
Sent via Deja.com
Sybase and Oracle DBA
http://www.deja.com/
Received on Tue Dec 26 2000 - 15:37:40 CET