Re: Double Encryption Illegal?

Frog2000 wrote:

> OK then, what is this file?
>
> "Trevor L. Jackson, III" <fullmoon_at_aspi.net> wrote in message
> news:39CA3454.26893D21_at_aspi.net...
> > John Myre wrote:
> >
> > > Guy Macon wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > Oh, *real* clever, Arturo. Did you think that nobody would notice
> > > > you double encrypting your post using ROT13? Well *I* noticed, and
> > > > I double DEcrypted it with ROT13 bnefor replying. So there!
> > >
> > > "bnefor"?
> > >
> > > I think there is a bug in your ROT13 implementation.
> >
> > These things are to be expected from a probabilistic decryption system.
> > ;-)
> >
> >
>
> ’Ñ)iæ#ŒŒ–Í¿12NBä!Gò3,˜ºÖ®ý…žmØ z°²=dW

Looks a lot like a multi unicode character sequence that has been encrypted with Rot-257.

When you offer gibberish and ask for more, what are you likely to get? Received on Thu Sep 21 2000 - 00:00:00 CEST