Re: Replication question

Brett R. Selleck wrote:
>
> Keri Hardwick (kerih_at_sprintmail.com) wrote:
> : Have to beg to differ with you here. I find Replication Manager an
> : enormous pain to work with, and I'd avoid it unless you need one of its
> : features, like scheduling synchronization. The graphics don't update
> : properly to keep track of the replica sets, and since the whole point of
> : it is to be a graphical interface, if the graphics are off, it's just
> : not fun at all. It is far simpler IMO to just use the replication menu
> : commands or code to manage the process.
> :
> : And using, or not using, replication manager has no impact on how Access
> : handles autonumber fields.
> :
> : Keri Hardwick
>
> Indirect replication is not possible nor is internet replication possible
> without the use of the replication manager. As for the graphics not
> updating correctly, I have never experienced this. The only problem that I
> have ran into with either stand alone replication or replication manager
> was a Novell Locking issue.
>
> Not arguing just discussing!
>
> Brett Selleck
> Application Developer
> Meijer Inc.

Actually, I'm glad to hear someone has had better luck with it than I did!

Keri Received on Wed Jul 08 1998 - 00:00:00 CEST