Re: Oracle Objects vs. RDO-ODBC for VB

From: Gerardo P. Fragante <fragante_at_unixg.ubc.ca>
Date: 1996/10/21
Message-ID: <MPLANET.326bb81bfragante9896db_at_news.ucs.ubc.ca>#1/1

In article <3268E66F.697C_at_interaccess.com>, greenie_at_interaccess.com says...
> Gerardo P. Fragante wrote:

Thanks to all for their advise re: RDO vs OO40. I will definitely look at 0040. On a related note, I am using NT 4.0 so should I use 0040 for NT (3.51) or 0040 for 95? Or are they just the same?

What version of PO7 will work with NT 4.0? PO7 for NT (3.51) or PO7 for 95?

Thanks,
Gerardo Received on Mon Oct 21 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mark Wagoner: "Re: Oracle Objects vs. RDO-ODBC for VB"
Previous message: Yoram zilberberg: "Re: Data Integrity Information"
Maybe in reply to: Gerardo P. Fragante: "Oracle Objects vs. RDO-ODBC for VB"
In reply to Rick Greenwald: "Re: Oracle Objects vs. RDO-ODBC for VB"
Next in thread: Mark Wagoner: "Re: Oracle Objects vs. RDO-ODBC for VB"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message