Re: SMP & threads for SQL queries
From: Trent Piepho <xyzzy_at_u.washington.edu>
Date: 1996/09/14
Message-ID: <51d2h1$gs3_at_nntp5.u.washington.edu>#1/1
Date: 1996/09/14
Message-ID: <51d2h1$gs3_at_nntp5.u.washington.edu>#1/1
In article <3239e26c.798075912_at_news.dtc.net>,
John Matzen <wizard_at_mrinc.com> wrote:
>
>>John Stevens <jstevens_at_bamboo.verinet.com> wrote in article
>><516t1c$9ru_at_bamboo.verinet.com>...
>>> >| Or even (ick!) SCO.
>>> >
>>> >Support 'em both. SCO has been less trouble.
>>>
>>> What makes SCO or Solaris more real than Linux?
>
>Because, SCO UnixWare and Solaris (and NT, and OS/2, and even Windows
>95 (!flames,plez)) support multithreaded applications. Linux does
What are you talking about? Linux has both user space and kernel space threads. I also haven't found threads to be so great compared to multiple processes. Sure they can be usefull, but they're not that great.
-- |Gazing up to the breeze of the heavens \ on a quest, meaning, reason | |came to be, how it begun \ all alone in the family of the sun | |curiosity teasing everyone \ on our home, third stone from the sun. | |Trent Piepho (xyzzy_at_u.washington.edu) -- Metallica |Received on Sat Sep 14 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST