Re: Win NT Versus Unix

From: <minglewood_at_brats.com>
Date: 1996/08/26
Message-ID: <4vrfc4$sg1_at_news04.deltanet.com>#1/1


In <4vfol5$4tf$1_at_mhafc.production.compuserve.com>, Bob Morningstar <104073.512_at_CompuServe.COM> writes:
>Your opinions please:
>
>Given that the platform will be a Alpha 2100 or 4100 platform, the
>budget is not the issue (expecting 200-300K to be spent).
>Moving off of a creaky Novell 3.12/7.1.4 platform with a 12GB
>database, what would you do?
>
>Door #1: Windows NT 3.5x or 4.x (in the future) running Oracle.
>Door #2: Unix (whatever flavor Digital sells) and Oracle
>Door #3: SCO Unix on Intel (hell of lot cheaper) and Oracle
>Door #4: Oracle for Novell on Netware 4.1 with SMP with Pentium
> Pro processors (at least 4).
>
>Your opinions and rational please! Thanks for any insight you
>can provide.
>
>Bob Morningstar
>
>--
>Aluminum Rain is bad for your health.
>40000 years is not that long.
>Why couldn't Bill and Ron been on the same flight?

If you can't figure things out for yourself and don't know why Bill wasn't on the plane, then you obviously don't need my help. Received on Mon Aug 26 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message