Re: Developer 2000 weak points??

Mike Openshaw wrote:
>
> Jerry Gillard <DoubleEx_at_prolog.net> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
 

> >We're considering Developer 2000 for our development tool working with Oracle Databases. Some of my associates
> >are not overly excited about Oracle tools because of their weak track record in this area. However, I think
> >Oracle may have a good product here but am not hearing much about it.
 

> >From those of you who use it, is it reasonably fast and usable when deployed (not developed) on 8mb pcs? Are
> >there any downsides you could throw at me since Oracle has shown me the shiny side?
 

> >TIA
 
> >Jerry
>
> Run time will function on 8 Meg PCs, but I wouldn't use the word 'run.
> They do well on 16 Meg, 486/66, however. The development environment
> is robust, but a few Windows convention are hard to implement.
> Michael B. Openshaw
> Integrated Medical Networks
> (Opinions expressed are my own)I have used Forms4.5 on the PC and a PowerMAC. I too have found it to
be a robust product. I see this product only getting better. One thing to watch out for when porting a 'form' from one platform to another is the different appearance of each 'form'.

-Greg Received on Thu Apr 18 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST