Re: Does anyone think this group needs splitting into subgroups?
From: Richard Frazier <rfrazier_at_mailstorm.dot.gov>
Date: 1996/03/06
Message-ID: <4hkcc1$3pb_at_news.dot.gov>#1/1
Date: 1996/03/06
Message-ID: <4hkcc1$3pb_at_news.dot.gov>#1/1
Steven Tolkin # VATA (sy71046_at_vantage75.vantage.fmr.com) wrote:
: If a split is made we should use the word "server" not "rdbms" because Oracle
: is clearly moving to be a "Universal server", i.e. object/relational not
: purely relational.
: I support a split into: server, tools, jobs, and misc.
I like this split option better than any other i have seen yet. Makes a lot more sense than trying to get too detailed!
: --
: Steven Tolkin steve.tolkin_at_fmr.com (617) 563-0516 fax 476-8974
: Fidelity Investments 82 Devonshire St. V12B Boston MA 02109
: Any remarks are my own. I'm not really an actor -- I just play one on TV.
Received on Wed Mar 06 1996 - 00:00:00 CET