PowerBuilder Vs Oracle Developer
From: Dave Herzstein <dherzstein_at_lmsc.lockheed.com>
Date: 1995/11/09
Message-ID: <47u0ds$lr7_at_butch.lmsc.lockheed.com>#1/1
Date: 1995/11/09
Message-ID: <47u0ds$lr7_at_butch.lmsc.lockheed.com>#1/1
- Efficiency of Oracle database support
- Usefulness of documentation
- Maturity and reliability of installed base
- Cross-platform availability
- Ease of use for developer
- Responsiveness of technical/customer support
- Vendor reliability and survivability
- Amount of code needed to be written
- Ability to display images of various formats
- Users groups/forums
- Ease of learning
- Workstation resources required
- Object Linking and Embedding (OLE) and VBX
- Integrated architecture
- Functionality
- Interface with external programs
- Scalability (for software distribution)
- Portability (for native feel-and-look)
- Object-oriented language environment
- 3rd Party Support (for analysis, legacy systems, DBA)
- Licensing policy
- Business graphics capabilities
- Integration with CASE tools
Either e-mail (dherzstein_at_lmsc.lockheed.com) or follow-up postings
(comp.soft-sys.powerbuilder or comp.databases.oracle) would be
appreciated. Please note which product(s) you have experience with.
--
Dave Herzstein
Sunnyvale, California
dherzstein_at_lmsc.lockheed.com
Received on Thu Nov 09 1995 - 00:00:00 CET